Semen Pankin vs Daniil Bogatov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Pankin vs D. Bogatov

Semen Pankin
RUS
w
w
l
w
w
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
26
Age
19
-
Height
-
745
C. Rank
0
676
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Daniil Bogatov
RUS
l
l
w
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
26
Age
19
-
Height
-
745
C. Rank
0
676
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Pankin 1 - 0 Bogatov
They have played 2 sets in total, with Semen Pankin winning 2 and Daniil Bogatov winning 0. The last match between Semen Pankin and Daniil Bogatov was at the M15 Kayseri, 31-10-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Semen Pankin getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Pankin | 1 |
| Bogatov | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Kayseri(10-31-24)
Semen Pankin
6
6
Daniil Bogatov
2
2
S. Pankin vs D. Bogatov H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 64.23% (79-44) | Career Total W/L | 54.55% (30-25) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. Pankin vs D. Bogatov Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Semen Pankin has won 44.49% of points on their second serve, while Daniil Bogatov has won 41.68%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Semen Pankin, in recent form, has won 43.43% of their opponent's second serve points, while Daniil Bogatov has won 50.00%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.02% and 20.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Semen Pankin has saved 53.70% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Daniil Bogatov has saved 47.59% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Semen Pankin has won 62.07% of matches played (W/L 36/22), with Daniil Bogatov winning 55.56% (W/L 25/20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Semen Pankin has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 39/20), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/4). Daniil Bogatov has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 22/16), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 8/9).
- Player level: In the last year, Semen Pankin has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 35/20), where as Daniil Bogatov has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 25/20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Semen Pankin winning 1 times and Daniil Bogatov being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Semen Pankin winning 2 and Daniil Bogatov winning 0.
- The last match between Semen Pankin and Daniil Bogatov was at the M15 Kayseri, 31-10-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Semen Pankin getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:7:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Semen Pankin has played against opponents with an average rank of 343.5 while Daniil Bogatov has played against players with an average rank of 93.42.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Semen Pankin has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Daniil Bogatov has won 54% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Semen Pankin has converted 35.50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Daniil Bogatov has converted 30.95% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Semen Pankin vs Daniil Bogatov Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Pankin vs D. Bogatov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:7:0 | Average Match Time | 1:7:0 |
| 53% (23/43) | 1st Serve % | 62% (38/61) |
| 57% (13/23) | 1st Serve Win % | 47% (18/38) |
| 70% (14/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 30% (7/23) |
| 43% (6/14) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (2/3) |
| 59% (36/61) | Return Points Win % | 37% (16/43) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Pankin 54%, Bogatov 46%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Pankin 53%, Bogatov 54%.
Break Points Saved %: Pankin 62%, Bogatov 59%.
S. Pankin Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 7-5 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-7(4) 6-4 7-5 | ||
SF | L | 7-6(1) 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 7-6(3) 6-3 | ||
D. Bogatov Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-2 ret. | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 6-0 | ||
R1 | L | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-2 3-6 11-9 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||

S. Pankin vs D. Bogatov Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.23% (79/44) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.55% (30/25) |
| 62.91% (173/102) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.97% (68/58) |
| 55.63% (1472/1174) | Games Win/Loss | 52.14% (621/570) |
| 64.91% (37/20) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.89% (22/16) |
| 66.10% (39/20) | Clay Win/Loss | 47.06% (8/9) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 281 | Aces Total | 85 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 229 | Total Double Faults | 155 |
| 1:6:5 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 313.79 | Average Opponent Rank | 104.2 |
| 59% (3113/5275) | 1st Serve % | 56% (1047/1864) |
| 68% (2125/3113) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (715/1047) |
| 52% (1118/2162) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (369/817) |
| 42% (259/612) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (96/207) |
| 42% (2249/5297) | Return Points Win % | 42% (774/1849) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 65.00% (78/42) | Futures W/L | 54.55% (30/25) |
| 63% (75/119) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (29/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 34% (11/32) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 39% (12/31) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (9/17) |
| 89% (81/72) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (30/24) |
| 11% (81/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (30/5) |
| 14% (42/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (25/5) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
07:10 AM 18/11/25
Prediction03:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction04:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction03:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction01:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction07:00 PM 18/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
05:45
H2H 0-0
07:00
H2H 0-0
07:15
H2H 0-0
07:40
H2H 0-0
08:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal